X-Plane & FSX head to head HD

I was curious myself to see the comparison side by side. Clips were recorded with comparable settings within the Simulator. I chose a Scenery/location that would be able to run both simulators on high settings. Fraps had a hard time keeping up with FSX to maintain the rate of 29.97 while the recording rate never dropped below the target setting on X-Plane. I will let the Video do the rest of the talking. Sorry about the somewhat “crap shoot” of a landing. I was tired and just wanted the plane on the ground Song: Winter (Basse Dance) Please subscribe. More to come in FS2004, FSX and now X-Plane 9.

---

Similar Videos:

• FSX Flight Simulator X HD – Landing Las Vegas – 8 Thread i7 OC @ 3.80 GHz and ATI 4870 HD X2
• X-Plane 9.30 Beta San Francisco Approach
• Flight Simulator X – After Effects – Ariane 737-800 – Core i7 4870×2 12gb ddr3 ram
• PMDG MD11 for FS9 & FSX: External and Internal Visuals
• FSX: Basic (But Complete) ILS Landing Tutorial
• [HD] TNCM FSX Highest Graphics Settings Possible!!!
• [HD] Flight Simulator X – Ariane 737 – 800 RYR Aerosoft Lisboa Takeoff – Core i7 @ 3.8GHz
• HD – FSX Airbus A320-200 Kuwait Airways, Landing Kuwait International Airport